Learn more about user experience, web development and digital marketingView training courses

Our thinking

Our annual mCommerce report (PDF download) is ready for you to download for free and get busy with your mobile strategy!

There is plenty of statistical evidence out there that tells brands to jump on the mobile and mCommerce wagon ASAP, and they wouldn’t be wrong to. But in the rush to get involved in this lucrative platform as quickly as possible many brands haven’t stopped to think about how it would be best to develop and design a mobile experience and strategy for their target audience.

As a customer experience agency that just wasn’t good enough. So, to support the development and design work that is going on out there in the mobile space, we conducted a qualitative, ethnographic user research study. This looked at how consumers interact with their smartphones and understand their natural mobile shopping behaviours to use as a starting point when considering launching a mobile app, website or other mobile touchpoint.

Through a series of diary studies and in-depth interviews we have uncovered a set of key guidelines for anyone who is getting into or revamping their mobile presence with insight and recommendations including:

  • Should you develop and app or mobile website?
  • What activities are most appealing to consumers?
  • How can you get people to remember you?
  • What stops people from buying on their smartphone?

Our mCommerce report 2012 is free to download and exposes the actual research findings as well as recommendations from our mobile experience specialists at Webcredible!

Tags:

win-8

An authoritative figure in computing, albeit one you may never have heard of, has passed scathing judgement on Windows new operating system, Windows 8.

Gabe Newell (ex windows employee and co-founder of PC gaming giant Steam) voiced his opinion on Windows 8 at the Casual Connect game conference in Seattle.

“I think Windows 8 is a catastrophe for everyone in the PC space.  I think we’ll lose some of the top-tier PC/OEMs, who will exit the market. I think margins will be destroyed for a bunch of people.’

Ouch. So what did Windows do to rile Gabe so? Well, it has something to do with Windows threatening  the open nature of the PC, especially PC gaming, an issue Gabe addressed.

“There’s a strong temptation to close the platform [making probable reference to the windows store],” he said, “because they look at what they can accomplish when they limit the competitors’ access to the platform, and they say, ‘That’s really exciting.’”

So, Windows will be in direct competition with Steam come Windows 8,  something Gabe is none too pleased with; but is this the ‘catastrophe’? One would hope not – Gabe does seem to be genuinely concerned for the innovation open platforms offer.

‘In order for innovation to happen, a bunch of things that aren’t happening on closed platforms need to occur. Valve wouldn’t exist today without the PC, or Epic, or Zynga, or Google. They all wouldn’t have existed without the openness of the platform.’

So is Windows 8 a catastrophe for ‘everyone in the PC space’? What do you think? In my opinion, for PC gaming/gamers… perhaps; Steam is a gaming platform and his comments have to be considered in a gaming context, even if Gabe would would have you believe otherwise:

“This isn’t about video games,” he claimed. “It’s about thinking about goods and services in a digital world.”

Our recent Retail report evaluated the multi-channel e-commerce experience for 15 of the UK’s best known high street retailers. Next performed really well with scores of 4 or 5 out of 5 for the majority of guidelines, and it’s likely that it would have come top but for a poor checkout process (check out the report for the winner, it isn’t who we were expecting!). For Next, the guideline specifying that the ‘Checkout process is appropriate, effective and easy to use’ gave them no points at all. There are lessons here for everyone so pay attention…

The Next checkout process suffers from

  • Poor feedback following add to basket actions
  • Confusing login/register form (which you can read more about in my other blog ‘Most common checkout usability issue ever‘) and,
  • Incomplete and inconsistently displayed progress bar amongst other issues.

However, the worst offence by next in their check out process was the forced ‘Credit account’ that online customers are essentially forced to open… That is what I am going to look into in this blog post.

1. Reading the small print

However, the main issue with the checkout relates to the default creation of a Next credit account. After entering personal details, customers reach the following page:

On the face of it, this page is about whether to get free delivery by requesting the catalogue, and checking the terms and conditions box before proceeding to payment. Customers generally don’t read the terms and conditions but perhaps in this case they should.

There’s a lot of extra text on this page below the preference options dealing with separate matters, but buried between information about the invoice for the directory and viewing directory statements online, is the crucial text about agreeing to open a credit account and agreeing to a credit search being carried out.

It’s easy for customers eager to complete the checkout process to miss this information because of the other visual clutter, but it’s also likely that customers won’t be expecting a credit account to be opened since the vast majority of ecommerce transactions just prompt for a credit or debit card.

2. Where are you in the process?

If customers press the ‘Complete’ button, and the credit account isn’t successfully created, the following page is presented:

This is likely to confuse and surprise customers who weren’t even aware that Next was trying to set up a credit account for them. It’s also potentially confusing because the progress bar has disappeared and it’s not immediately clear where customers are in the process. Payment symbols are displayed but the expected payment page hasn’t appeared. There’s a button but the label ‘Continue shopping’ is usually associated with ‘exit the basket page and return to the main site to browse more items’.

3. Forced further actions

However, if customers press the ‘Complete’ button in the previous page, and the credit account is successfully created, delivery details are checked and the goods are automatically sent to the registered address:

The page encourages customers to ‘relax’ but they’re unlikely to relax if a) they were unaware that a credit account was being created and b) they didn’t want a credit account in the first place.

The option to pay by debit or credit card is offered, but as a less prominent link rather than a more obvious button. Even if customers only ever intended to pay immediately (rather than open a credit account) this option isn’t provided. You have to open a credit account and then close it. But you’d better be quick:

If you take too long to decide, then Next decides for you and assumes you’ll be paying through the credit account.

In a conventional checkout process (one that customers are expecting), customers will be looking for a confirmation page before payment just to check that everything’s correct. In the Next checkout process this does happen before payment but the consequence of confirming is that the goods are automatically sent. Customers can’t bail out of the process at the last minute by not providing payment details because by this time, the goods are on their way.

This is a poor customer experience because some customers will rightly feel they’ve been forced or tricked into a credit account they never wanted. At least in a physical Next store, the option to open a credit account is explicitly offered before you pay.

The consequences

Multiple credit card checks are known to impact negatively on credit history, so customers who never planned to open a credit account would justifiably feel aggrieved about Next performing one by default. Following customer complaints, Next announced that by August 2011 it would only implement ‘soft’ credit checks that don’t leave a mark on customers’ credit history. Even if this has been implemented, wording in the checkout process only refers to a ‘credit check’ so it’s unclear what the impact on credit history would be.

A more transparent approach that gives customers control would be to offer the option to open a credit account (with all the undoubted benefits that go with it) at the payment part of the process rather than immediately after personal details are registered. Have you experienced the shock of having a credit account with Next, or any other retailers? Let us know in the comments below!

In our recent Retail multichannel customer experience report, we found that nearly all of the brands we researched performed poorly in their communications with the customer after a purchase has been made and the product has been delivered. It was the lowest scoring guideline in the report with an average of 1.5 points out of 5.

Keeping in contact following a sale is a really important and useful tool for retention, repeat purchases and customer loyalty. Customers are more likely to buy with the company again provided they’re satisfied with their purchase and the level of service (i.e. the ordering experience and delivery.)

Most companies evaluated in the report just offered blanket, un-targeted offer emails or repeated requests to review the purchased item. Customers will only place product reviews on a website if they’re sufficiently motivated by a positive or negative experience, not because they’re sent reminder emails. This represents a lost opportunity to really engage with customers, to build a personal rapport with them.

There’s a lot more companies could be doing that would be beneficial to them and improve the brand experience for their customers:

  • To suggest other items which are complementary e.g. these shirts to go with trousers recently purchased
  • To show the purchased product in context with other products i.e. to showcase a particular look in a room or outfit worn by a model
  • To offer alternative products if customers have returned items
  • Other customers also bought these products
  • Other books by the same author, products by the same designer
  • Content that reaffirms customer taste having bought a certain product e.g. bright pinks are this season’s colour
  • Chances to buy accessories
  • Offers and discounts that can be used with your next purchase

These aren’t new ideas. We’ve done lots of research at Webcredible that demonstrates that customers prefer targeted recommendations. The technology exists and yet the follow-up communication appears not to have moved on from shot-in-the-dark newsletters.

If you’re a retailer we would be really interested to know what you are doing and how you go about your after sales communications! Has anyone got some good examples of best practice after-delivery communications?

There’s a usability issue so common that I’ve lost count of the number of times I’ve seen customers stumble on it. At first glance it might not be an obvious usability issue, but years of user testing and user research later it proves to be a problem for a large proportion of users across a broad spectrum of profiles. It happens right at the start of the checkout process with the form to either log in or register:

When presented with a log-in form, users are often naturally drawn to start filling in the edit boxes on the left to sign-in. They don’t read the surrounding text – they’re only interested in getting through the checkout process quickly so they can complete the purchase. They don’t even notice the button on the right that is for new customers who don’t have an account already.

This is fine for existing customers, but new customers are likely to believe that the sign-in fields are the start of the registration process and if they have an account or not they would expect to move the process forward without entering new information on a new form. This is often not the case.

Providing an error message stating that ‘details don’t match the system’ may not resolve the situation. For customers that have many online accounts it’s feasible that they won’t remember if they have an account or not, but the error message assumes the customer is doing the right thing in trying to sign in; it suggests that an account with this email address exists and that the password is wrong. Perhaps the customer will enter the password again or a different password, and may not realise the issue lies because they are filling in the wrong form.

Meanwhile, customer frustration and anxiety increase and the item remains tantalisingly unpaid for, increasing the likelihood of checkout abandonment. This is where a usability and user experience show their worth time and time again – no retailer should have this issue on their website if they are looking to optimise their sales and conversion.

It’s likely to be less of an issue if the new customer register button is on the left and the login fields are on the right because, since users naturally scan a screen top left to bottom right, they’re more likely to notice the button and decide if it’s relevant for them. But it still forces customers to decide whether they should register or log in, and the choice isn’t visually equal or obvious – it’s still tempting just to fill in those edit boxes. To try to eliminate this checkout usability issue, the choice has to be translated into the question ‘Do I already have an account with this company or not?’

Surprisingly, in our Ecommerce Retail report only 2 companies out of 15 presented the login/registration in a design that we recommend to our clients to resolve this issue:

Integrating the login/registration into 1 form means customers aren’t faced with the choice of whether to log in or register. They have to enter their email address in either situation, so that’s a no-brainer. Instead, the choice is presented as a simple question: ‘Do you have a password?’

Of course, they still have to remember if they have a password or not, but the particular confusion generated by the Next form and not knowing if it is your password that is wrong, or the fact you don’t actually have an account can’t happen. By answering ‘No’ they signal their intent to be a new customer. By answering ‘Yes’ they’re declaring they have an existing account – they’ll make sense of any error messages subsequently generated for a wrong password or non-existent account in this light.

Because the design is more streamlined, there’s less visual clutter, and less for the customer to consider. Customers will always make mistakes but the checkout process should be as smooth and short as possible.

So, why do so many companies persist with the clunky Next-style form that could see customers entering password after password and then when realising they perhaps don’t have an account having to re-fill a different form to sign up? I don’t know! But giant of Ecommerce, Amazon, go with the streamlined design as we recommend to our clients, which says it all.

Have you come across this checkout usability issue? Have you been stuck in the sign in or register loop and ended up typing in your details numerous times into different forms just to be able to buy something? Let us know in the comments below!

Case studies

Our success stories

  • Hotels.com

    Hotels.com gained a much stronger competitive advantage due to a great mobile strategy

  • Macmillan

    Macmillan got fantastic results from our work, including a 50% reduction in mobile homepage drop-offs

  • Hitachi Capital

    Hitachi Capital now delivers a market-leading online proposition and the best user experience possible

More case studies

Training academy

View training courses

About us

We're a user experience agency (UX agency) that creates people-centred, efficient and delightful digital experiences.

Get in touch on 020 7423 6320