Learn more about user experience, web development and digital marketingView training courses

Our thinking

Summer is over and as we are stepping quickly into winter, we have already started reflecting on its good and bad moments. For me, open air music festivals are always top priority in my list of summer events. I enjoy the atmosphere, the people and of course the madness of watching lots of artists in just a few hours. But I have had bad experiences as well – many of this summer’s London-based festivals had a sort of bad luck (or maybe bad organisation?).

The various social media platforms are nowadays the main channels of communication between event organisers and their audience. In this post, I will focus on three festivals I attended and I will try to analyse how their organisers used social media to create, maintain or destroy customer relationships. These festivals are Field Day , Bloc and Hard Rock Calling.

Whenever I reflect on an event, I try to distinguish what happened before, during and after it. That’s what creates the overall audience experience, isn’t it?

Before The Event

Before the event people look to get in the festival mood, to learn more about the artists and maybe win some free tickets to share with friends.
Field Day organisers knew that very well and they created the right style of engagement through Twitter, Facebook and other media. Throughout the year they uploaded podcasts featuring artists from the line-up. After the full line-up was announced, they made targeted posts with news about it and launched quizzes on Facebook. Hundreds of comments and tens of shares on Facebook encouraged various friends of existing followers to ‘Like’ the festival page. Closer to the day of the event, they were regularly giving away free tickets to lucky people who answered to a quiz, re-tweeted or shared a post.

What do they gain? Obviously they increase awareness of their festival and keep interest high (who doesn’t want a free ticket?). A few hours before the big day, they uploaded photos from the space and the stages. In that way, they increased the anticipation and ensured their audience that everything was going according to plan.

Bloc and Hard Rock Calling organisers followed a similar but more mediocre approach. For example, a ship  was to be the main stage at Bloc festival, but fans where kept largely in the dark. Bloc made little effort to stimulate any discussions, retweets or comments among the fans as to their unusual choice of venue.

During the event

During the event, festival goers do not check their Twitter (mainly due to the fact that the 3G network is down, they don’t want to risk bringing their smartphones or they have run out of battery). At any rate, the experience is out there and there is no need for Twitter or Facebook news (the romantic approach).
Well… that might be true, but only when everything goes as planned. What happens if something goes wrong? I was at Bloc when Snoop Dogg never came on stage. Social media was the only way to learn what was happening. At that time, there wasn’t any official announcement, only tweets with rumours, which eventually became reality.

After the event

After the event, people tend to reflect on their experience by sharing pictures, footage or reviews.

Field Day organisers shared audience-generated content from YouTube. Hard Rock Calling fans were able to see professional photographs only few hours after the event.
You might wonder how Bloc organisers faced their catastrophe. The festival was cancelled due to crowd safety concerns in the middle of its first day. The organisers released an official announcement 4 hours after the cancellation, which made things even more complicated. Their facebook page received thousands of comments from people who expressed mostly anger… at best. Everyone was asking for excuses and refunds, but from the other side there was complete silence. You’d better not visit the festival’s Facebook page today, because you will feel sorry or furious. Only after 2 months, the organisers were able to speak plain language and release an official announcement, but it was too late. Loyalty had been lost.

Hard Rock Calling also faced difficulties. Bruce Springsteen was forced to stop while he was playing a duet with Sir Paul McCartney due to overtime (after 11pm there was to be silence). The organisers dealt with fans’ complaints by being the first to write about this decision. They also replied quickly to any followers who complained on Twitter.

This approach to social media complaints is not restricted to the festival space; O2 expertly handled the social media maelstrom in the wake of their 2 day signal outage. Showing empathy and dealing with individual complaints personably goes a long way in calming a social media storm.

Conclusion

Social media strategies are becoming one of the most important factors in the success of your event in terms of attracting and engaging with your audience.

Some might argue that the budget can also influence the promotion of the event. That’s absolutely true. Field Day is an independent festival with a focus on new artists, whereas Hard Rock Calling is held by Live Nation, which is one of the largest event organisers worldwide. Budgets can’t be compared, but numbers of followers on twitter are very close if that means anything.

Social media is a cheap and fairly easy way to create bonds with your target audience. Nevertheless, in the worst case scenarios, you must also be brave and face negative comments in the same way you retweeted compliments. Either you take the risk or leave it.

The problem

Having researched, designed, and tested various social media platforms for different types of businesses for the past year, I’ve learnt one valuable lesson – when it comes to asking the average website user about what they think about a new social media related concept, most people aren’t able to imagine it without making references to existing popular social networking sites such as Facebook, Twitter or Linkedin.

The reason for this is simple, social media content is about communication. In its simplest form, a 2-way interaction between a person and another has to exist in order for this to work or make any sense. In other words, social media technology cannot exist without someone responding. In the case of testing prototypes, this interaction is difficult to simulate, and given the personal nature of such content, it is often difficult for participants to relate to fictitious content.

For that reason, asking participants during usability testing sessions about what they think about the functionality of prototype social media platforms usually ends up with references being made to existing, familiar social media technologies – the most popular being Facebook and Twitter. Many participants that I’ve spoken to try to imagine the social interactions taking place using Twitter or Facebook as their reference points.

Some participant quotes include:

  • “I think it will be useful if it’s like Twitter feeds ”
  • “Oh, is it like being so and so’s friend on Facebook?”
  • “I don’t think I will find it useful because I am not on Twitter or Facebook”
  • “I think I will use it if it’s like Twitter or Facebook”

A solution

See the problem with the above? What if the concepts you’re testing are neither like Twitter nor Facebook but share some elements of the two? Or even better, what if the concept you’re testing is completely revolutionary and is nothing like Twitter or Facebook?

Hence, there are a few things to bear in mind when interpreting participant feedback on social media functionality:

  • You won’t know how people will use it until it’s launched and used
  • User generated content determines the value of the product itself
  • User generated content can change the intention of the product
  • Users might not know what the product can do until something’s happened
  • Constant monitoring and analysis is important to understand what works and what doesn’t
  • Clear explanation to participants on how it works during testing is important to get valid feedback
  • This can include explaining how it is similar to or different from Facebook or Twitter if relevant
  • Provide scenarios of the social interactions by using fictitious characters when possible
  • Even better, use fictitious characters that people can relate to as shown in this brilliant example by Matt Biddulph http://www.flickr.com/photos/mbiddulph/7407629996/in/photostream
  • Produce enough realistic dummy content for the prototype to aid understanding of a particular user journey or scenario
  • If interaction components are key, make sure they are included in the test prototype and explained clearly to participants

The conclusion

Social interactions are complex and difficult to imagine or predict. It takes time for a social media platform to generate enough content to encourage adoption. As a social media platform evolves with continuous use, new ideas and needs will arise, creating new design opportunities.

Tags:

Everyone would agree that the subject of social media is vast, quickly changing and the scope is endless, but do businesses really reach out far enough with social media? Are there specific industries out there that could benefit from re-thinking the way social media is used and bring a more financially visible return on their efforts? This got us thinking about charities and the 3rd sector – is there a missed opportunity for charities to use social media to cultivate their online supporters into donors? So we took it a stage further and asked ourselves “how can social media be used by charities to actually fundraise?”

How do charities use social media today?

Many charities are extraordinarily good with social media and online communities, are should be looked as examples of best practice in the are of social community development. However, according to the recent 2012 Digital Giving Review published by Give as you Live, they report that only 30% of donations to charity are received through online channels, despite the online and offline audiences being much the same.  In contrast to this 47.5% of charities use social media channels to cultivate support for their cause, but the burning question is how do we convert those valuable supporters into donors, and how can we bridge this gap? There certainly seems to be a trick here that’s being missed…

How can you harness social media?

So as a result from all this thinking 2 things happened. Up until very recently we offered a single day training course on Social media strategy.  The course was so jam packed with information, interactive exercises and combined with the ever-evolving social landscape the course was just getting bigger and bigger. So, we expanded our jam packed 1 day course into a 2 day social media course and incorporated even more practical and interactive exercises on the latest platforms.

For those experts among you we have also launched an advanced social media course for those wanting to use social media as part of your digital strategy, look to increase the return from your activity, as well as gain a greater understanding of the impact your social media activity is having on your business and website.

We have also delved even further into the realms of social media and developed a social media for the 3rd sector course specifically tailored to charities.We thought it was important and completely achievable that social media can do much more for your charity so we created a course to help you:

  • Engage with supporters; get referrals; promote your objectives
  • Boost credibility and increase connections
  • Get introduced to key donors
  • Tweet engaging posts directly to your target audience
  • Identify corporate and individual donors
  • Raise more funds!

We were surprised by the lack of uptake to date by brands.What do you think about the medium of social media and fundraising? Have you seen any great opportunities that have been missed or taken full advantage of by a charity? Let us know in the comments below…

Tags:

When Tim Berners-Lee was introduced during the opening ceremony of the 2012 Olympics little did I realise that it was hugely symbloic of what has been justly dubbed the first ‘digital Olympics’.

Having very vague memories of the past few Olympics in my head I wondered if it was my lack of interest in the event back then or the digital landscape that has changed tremendously since then which made this the first Olympics that I’ve ever truly engaged in.

Thinking back on the past few weeks, it has indeed been  the ‘first truly digital games’. It was a combination of how we consumed the events digitally from video on demand to the widespread usage of social media and mobile technology that has shaped this truly digital experience of the 2012 Olympics.

To begin with, my Twitter feed was full of hilarious and educational comments during the 4 hour-long opening ceremony. Following that, it was constantly catching up online on the medal count every few hours a day on my phone and watching replays of my favourite events whenever I feel like it. All sorts of content about the atheletes and events surfaced on social media generating cross-country conversations or ‘online cheering’ as well as friends sharing their video clips of events they’ve recorded from the venues on their little portable devices and the list goes on.

Also, the fact that I live in London meant that I got several emails a day from the organisers as well as Transport for London telling me what’s going on and where, who’s won a medal in what, hotspots to avoid for the day, train lines that might be affected by events, road closures, souveniers that I might want to buy (probably the least exciting content of all) and the list goes on and on. This has been extremely helpful and I was wondering what would it have been like if the digital infrastructure wasn’t there to support such activities.

So by the end of the Olympics, what difference has this all made? Well, to begin with, I actually know a few athletes names and faces and the different variations of events within a specific sport. I actually managed to watch events that I’ve missed and fast forwarded it to bits that I’m interested in. I know what some athletes think about their arch rivals because I was curious and hunted for the content online but most importantly, for a person who has little interest in sports, I was genuinely impressed by how much pain and hard work has been put in by the athletes to perform the most beautiful sporting feats – something that I’ve never realised as being so inspiring before.

They say that this year will be the year of the first social Olympic Games and there are a multitude of official London 2012, Olympics and official sponsor social media platforms and campaigns.

But what does being the first social Olympics really mean and what sort of impact will it have on the experience of the games in London and around the world?

Social media has grown in the past 8 years and as the last Olympics being in China causing a nervousness about social media due to their strict internet policies, the London Olympics poses the first opportunity to really take advantage of social media.

What is officially going on in the realms of social media?

There is a degree of fear about the use of social media for the International Olympics Committee and London 2012 social media teams though to do with managing the brand. There are huge Regulations about associating your business or yourself with the Olympic games ‘marks’ and set expressions. The regulations are there to protect the best interests of the sponsors and uphold the integrity of the Olympics brand, but some could technically be violated by people simply sharing through social media what they are seeing.

How well will all of this social media be managed?

We’ll have to wait and see! Social media is meant to be a bottom up approach to communicating, making it the choice of the people what they want to talk about, discover and discuss together. Social media is facilitating a world wide discussion and sharing of interest around the London Olympics, so the brand related regulations can’t be too strict or this process won’t occur.

What will also be particularly interesting to see is how feedback and negative comment is managed. The ability to manage what could be huge amounts of complaints about anything from travel to tickets will be telling to see how good the customer experience really is when under that much pressure with the time constraints that exist with a short term event.

Has anyone seen anything else great linked to London 2012 and social media out there? How do you think they’ll do with managing the level of feedback on their streams? Leave a comment below!

Case studies

Our success stories

  • Hotels.com

    Hotels.com gained a much stronger competitive advantage due to a great mobile strategy

  • Macmillan

    Macmillan got fantastic results from our work, including a 50% reduction in mobile homepage drop-offs

  • Hitachi Capital

    Hitachi Capital now delivers a market-leading online proposition and the best user experience possible

More case studies

Training academy

View training courses

About us

We're a user experience agency (UX agency) that creates people-centred, efficient and delightful digital experiences.

Get in touch on 020 7423 6320