Posts tagged with 'Social media'

Facebook considered easiest to use social network - I’m dubious

By Trenton Moss on 12 March 2010

Is it? Really? Personally I’m doubtful, but that’s the conclusion of our recent social network usability poll in which half of the respondents felt that Facebook was the easiest to use social network. We asked people ‘which social networking site do you think is the easiest to use?’ The full results were:

  • Myspace – 4%
  • Facebook – 50%
  • Twitter – 19%
  • Bebo – 1%
  • Friends Reunited – 1%
  • LinkedIn – 5%
  • Other – 7%
  • None of them are easy to use – 12%

Looking at those results, there’s clearly a correlation between the voting and the popularity of the social networks in question - no surprise really because the more you use a website the easier you will find it to use.

The difference between social networks and other websites is that the sites themselves are a pass-time, so users can (and are often happy to) learn how to use them properly. On other sites they usually wouldn’t be prepared to take the time.

I think the results might be very different if you were to have a sample of people that had never used any of these sites before, and you carried out usability testing on all the sites. Given the simplicity of Twitter’s proposition, I would expect that it’s the easiest to use for a beginner as there’s far less to learn compared to say Facebook or  any other social network.

I’d be interested to hear what you make of these results…

Engaging audiences through social media

By Jon White on 24 February 2010

Yesterday I headed to the National Housing Federation Marketing Communications conference over in Russell Square to give a presentation on engaging audiences through social media. The conference was great and I really enjoyed running my session, so I thought I’d share some of the key issues that I identified as important to consider when looking to engage customers and prospects through social media:

  1. Do your research
    Before you start using a social media site, find our if your target audiences are using it and how they’re using it. Based on this you can decide which channels are appropriate for your business.
  2. Develop your own strategy
    What works for one company may not work for another so its important, based on your research, to work out how your company can best use these sites.
  3. Focus on the long-term
    Social media isn’t a tool to get a short-term sales lift. You need to be patient and focus on building relationships and your brand.
  4. Offer something interesting or useful
    This can be information and knowledge, exclusive discounts on products and services or even an alternative channel for queries and customer service.
  5. Understand that the power is with the consumer
    Social media should not be treated as any other sales channel and the focus should be on interaction on the terms of the target audiences.  If it’s not on their terms, at best they’ll ignore you, at worst there will be a backlash.

If you’d like to see a recording of the full presentation which focuses on generic social media strategies for business as well as specifically on housing associations, it will be available on our YouTube channel later this afternoon.

Are you Twitter or Bitter? - Netimperative event

By Jon White on 24 September 2009

Last night a few of us here at Webcredible headed over to Soho for an evening of lively debate, organised by Netimperative, on whether Twitter is a good or bad thing for marketers and brands - Twitter or bitter?Webcredible Twitter page

The panel included representatives from Tangent One, Guava, TMG and 140Characters.co.uk, and there were many advantages and issues with Twitter discussed including one or two mentions of Habitat’s hastagging faux pas. Key benefits of Twitter identified included allowing brands to have a direct conversation with their customers, its usefulness for networking and live search, and its potential for PR and as part of an integrated digital campaign.

Disadvantages discussed included that there is a lot of noise for consumers to get through on the platform, it requires time to get into and most importantly to get right, and that people are struggling to see the ROI for brands.

I raised the question of reputation management last night and thought I’d share my thoughts on this issue and some of the others discussed at the event. Reputation management is an important part of social media marketing, especially Twitter, and we’ve heard plenty of stories about how brands have made mistakes and damaged their reputation online. But what about the flipside - Twitter squatting? Twitter has grown to a point where, like domain names, it’s worth registering your name even if you’re not going to use it to protect from third parties taking your Twitter identity and using it in detriment to your brand.

In reference to the stories of brands spectacularly failing to ‘get’ Twitter and causing damage to their reputation as a result.  I would argue that even though it is a lot easier than other channels to get wrong, as long as you follow some very basic principles that are true of most digital marketing disciplines, you can test the water and begin to engage without falling into this trap. I mean, you wouldn’t send out a marketing email to someone who hadn’t opted-in with ‘Iran elections’ in the subject line to get their attention would you?

As for measurement and ROI? Well there are many offline channels that are a lot more difficult to measure and analytics is a pretty good gauge of how successful your use of Twitter is, by the traffic being referred to your site from Twitter.

In terms of how to use it, well we use it as a channel for sharing all our content, we allow people to find us and when they connect with us we respond to them. So far, that has proved a pretty successful approach.

Anyway, back to the event - I think the pro-Twitter crowd edged the debate and let’s face it that’s the camp we’re in. But, given that this blog is also an interactive medium I’m keen to hear your thoughts on how brands (including Webcredible) should use Twitter.

Facebook makes a profit!

By Danielle Lyon on 18 September 2009

Facebook has just announced these last few days that after 2 and a half years of connecting people and letting them ‘poke’ each other it has finally made a profit.

Webcredible Facebook page

Facebook generates revenue from advertising and sponsored groups and no doubt the social networking site will be focusing on improving its offering for the big brands and businesses in order to maximise its profitability. But how will this impact the current users?

Having acquired FriendFeed and with its move into ‘real time’ it has been following in the footsteps of Twitter, although I think personally they have very different purposes. I view Facebook as being more of a socialising tool than the other sites out there as it is appeals to a wider range of people. With the fastest increasing user demographic being the over 35’s, this demonstrates that the older generations who may not have necessarily grown up with the Internet have found it easy to use and engaging.

However, one thing that will be interesting to see is whether, as Facebook and its users get older, will the broader appeal decrease?  I know I am already bored of having to de-tag myself from hideous childhood photos that my mum/dad/aunties post… and that’s just the start of it!

But back to my point, if the wider appeal does decrease then so will the interest to advertise to a wider audience.

Unfortunately I’m not Derren Brown and I can’t predict lotto numbers or the future, but it will be interesting to see how Facebook changes and moves forward. Or now that it’s finally making a profit should they sell up and quit while they’re ahead (but let’s face it, it’s unlikely to go the way of Friends Reunited)?

BC: Before Cyberworld

By Frankie Pagnacco on 7 August 2009

So the young are jumping off social networking sites as fast as they jumped on? And why this reverse phenomenon? Because their parents and teachers are storming on there in droves. Reconnecting with lost friends and lovers, having affairs, breaking up marriages, but worse, throwing sheep at their own kids.

I speak from that parental generation to tell you: we’re making up for lost connectivity and exposure.

It reminds me of a time I feel compelled to relate for its now alien quaintness. It was the mid 90s and I took off on a post graduation travel fest that lasted several years and several trips. In Antigua Guatemala I heard that my best friend was getting married by letter at Poste Restante. Mail was collected there with that old fashioned username/password combo called a passport. A day later I’d moved on and would have missed her wonderful news.

My trips were musicless except for the 2 or 3 cassette tapes of bands like ‘Juan Louis Guerra y su 4 40′ that I bought and lost along the way. They had to be played in a cumbersome Sony Walkman. The heaviest hardware was my extensive camera/lens/film/cotton buds/compressed air/filters collection. No laptops in my time although the fear of robbery was no less acute.

Keeping in touch with family and friends involved a call home to mum by telephone, the message being further relayed with errors and embellishments (again by telephone) to anyone who was interested. Facebook, myspace, bebo?

I didn’t call home. Mainly to avoid my mother’s “you’re going to die” hysteria which could be unsettling. No parental satellite tracking of my mobile co-ordinates thank god. Especially the trip where I travelled through Central America (that’s places like Nicaragua and El Salvador, not Kansas) by motorbike. On my own. Because, no word of a lie, the previous trip I’d fallen in love with Pascal, a motorcycling Frenchman (I’m only human). Pascal was quickly lost forever because we never swapped (postal) addresses. I think I thought I might just bump into him out there.

And that reminds me that only half a decade later an ex-boyfriend’s new girlfriend did the exact same trip and blogged about it. And got a book deal. And is now a writer. And married to my ex.

I’m not bitter though. No. Not at all.