Posts tagged with 'Usability'

If it works for Amazon, why wouldn’t it work for your site?

By Ariana Polyviou on 9 August 2010

When creating a new ecommerce website, one of the key issues that is likely to come up is ‘How to create a successful user interface?’ An easy answer could be ‘Do it like Amazon’ and besides, nobody can deny it, Amazon is one of the most successful ecommerce stores worldwide.

Amazon’s facts speak for themselves:

  • Listed at 17th position within the 1000 most visited sites for June 2010
  • Approximately 81,000,000 unique visitors per month
  • Around 3,600,000,000 page visits per month.
  • Market capitalization of over $50 billion

Sometimes it’s good to copy the big guys. But copying a successful design does not mean that the company’s success will be copied with it!

So, ‘If it works for Amazon, why wouldn’t it work for your site?’

Reason #1 – Amazon’s low prices offsets its imperfect user experience

Amazon definitely doesn’t have a sparkling interface design. So what is it about it that makes it so successful?

Amazon can afford to sell at cost or below cost prices, offer free delivery and still have profit! It relies on its large number of customers and its fast selling pace, which can provide cash before the payment of the goods, is due to their original supplier.

Question #1: Is this type of marketing included in your business plan?

Reason #2: Amazon’s existing customers are more important than new ones

If you’ve used Amazon before then it’s more than likely that you will easily find what you are looking for.  Firstly, because you know that in order to find the product that best suits you, you have to follow the process of:

  • Searching by a product by name
  • Choosing only one category of goods
  • Then have the sorting and filtering options enabled

Secondly, if you’re an existing user then Amazon already knows your purchasing patterns. This boosts up your chances to experience serendipity by receiving more personalised product recommendations.

Amazon has a lot of existing customers who are used to its product search process. Thus, making major changes to it involves the risk of dissatisfying its 81m+ registered customers. But what happens if you’re a new user and there’s no purchasing patterns log for you?

You’re most likely to get odd or not useful recommendations and struggle to search efficiently for the desired product. Therefore, unless you have plenty of time, patience or luck, it’s unlikely that you’ll reach a product’s best matches to your requirements.

Question #2: Can you afford transacting only with your existing customers?

Reason #3:  Amazon is continuously testing

Have you ever noticed frequent change of features in the layout of Facebook e.g. the Newsfeed?

Of course, if you are Facebook  (the website with the most traffic for June 2010) or Amazon, then you can afford to test some new designs and features directly on your users. Besides, losing some of them may not even be noticeable!

The problem with copying Amazon is that you can’t know what’s there to stay and what’s to be removed after a while. You can’t know which features have a positive and which ones have a negative return. Copying Amazon involves a high risk of copying features which are temporarily placed on the site just for experimental purposes.

Question #3: Can your ecommerce site afford having features that are possibly not usable?

Reason #4: Amazon has good customer reviews

Sometimes, people hesitate to purchase goods through ecommerce sites because they’re unable to physically see the item they’re planning to buy. Reading reviews of recent buyers of a product can provide future buyers with a clearer idea about what to expect from the purchase. It’s hard to get people to post feedback on a product. Statistically, 1 in 3000 of buyers are likely to leave a review for an item. Considering Amazon’s traffic, this still gives it enough reviews per product.

Many people choose to buy from Amazon not necessarily because of its good prices or interface but because of the trustworthy community and the content it holds.

Question #4: Is the size of your customer community analogous to the Amazon one?

Reason #5: Amazon’s famous name is enough for making its users feel secure

Have you ever noticed that Amazon does not have an EV SSL certificate? This certificate indicates when it’s safe to transact by changing the URL initials from http to https and turning the URL address bar green.

The use of this certificate is critical for making customers feel safe and confident to purchase goods using their credit card over the Internet.  But, if you’re as popular as Amazon, then there is no trustworthiness issue.  In fact, people may not even check to see if you’re using an SSL certificate.

Question #5: Is your  company as famous as Amazon?

In summary…

If your answers aren’t ‘Yes’ for the questions #1-5, then perhaps you should rethink before copying Amazon.

To sum up, just because the system is working for Amazon, it doesn’t mean it will work as efficiently for you. Each design is created to match a certain type of business model. If the business model of Amazon doesn’t match yours, then perhaps copying the design of Amazon to your site could be a bad idea.

Building Perfect Council Websites ‘10 conference

By Pete Broadbent on 15 July 2010

Yesterday I had the pleasure of chairing a discussion attended by representatives from 10 different councils at the Building Perfect Council Websites ‘10 conference at Olympia.

I spent a few minutes headlining the findings from our 2010 council report The Devil Is in the Detail and then opened up the discussion. The overwhelming consensus was that all council sites need to improve in some way but there are a number of challenges to overcome to achieve this:

  • Getting budgets for citizen research and usability studies in a time of extreme cost cutting is going to difficult
  • High reliance on third party software vendors to make changes to self service functionality needs to resolved
  • Balancing internal and external stakeholder expectations needs careful management
  • Large and inflexible site structures that have grown organically over the years need to be refined
  • Unused and unnecessary content needs to be edited or removed

We discussed a number of approaches and techniques for getting citizens involved in the design process that won’t break the bank. Techniques I’ve used before include:

  • Setting up informal usability testing sessions in a library, shopping centre or council offices
  • Undertaking detailed desk-based research that combines expert website evaluation alongside detailed analyses of website statistics to build a picture of what is working and what is suboptimal
  • Focus group research to gather feedback quickly with multiple demographic groups
  • Small-scale usability sessions with a small number of participants to validate the desk research and flesh out the common problems and concerns
  • Telephone call observation and interviews with contact centre representatives to identify the top issues that people contact the council about

As with all user-centered design it’s imperative that careful consideration is done upfront when planning the research. A coherent research plan will ensure that the component parts work together to build one picture and validate each other. The target audience needs to be agreed upfront and if recruiting for usability testing be very specific who you want to test with and recruit appropriately; there’s little value testing your self service functionality with someone who’ll never use it or has little or no interest in the tasks you give them.

Above all it’s important to remember that any citizen involvement is better that none!

ITV – it’s all to play for

By Claire Savage on 24 June 2010

I heard on the radio that historically England performs better when their games are broadcast on BBC television and not ITV. So it was with great relief that I settled down to watch the match on BBC Television yesterday, not just because of the risk of cutting to an advert just before the 1 goal of the match, but also with some hope we would get through to the last 16!

Perhaps it’s not surprising then, that ITV came bottom in our World Cup Websites: All to Play For report. Over the last few weeks we have analysed the World Cup-focused websites of FIFA and four major broadcasters - the BBC, Sky, ITV and Eurosport, against 10 best practice usability guidelines.

It’s been an interesting report to write as really this event could be argued to be the main predecessor to the Olympics 2012 and lessons learnt during the World Cup will be the basis of online presence in 2 years time. We think the 2010 World Cup has seen people going online en masse like no other sporting event before, just think about the multi platform user experience during London 2012.

Enough of the future and back to the present. We’re down to the last 16 and a message for ITV:

‘ITV – it’s all to play for.. but currently it’s BBC 1 and ITV 0’.

Monthly user experience finds

By Mru Kodali on 23 April 2010

A month’s gone quick and it’s time for a few more UX finds. This time we have an image theme:

  1. stock.xchng, an image site exclusively for free stock photography - handy if you’re designing on a budget
  2. ExplainIA, a contest on Flickr to explain information architecture in words, images, audio or video (video of winning entry)

That’s all for now folks.

Monthly user experience finds

By Mru Kodali on 26 March 2010

As promised last month, here are a few more UX related gems we’ve discovered, with somewhat of a comic theme to them:

  1. A comic about design hell - funnily enough, this was forwarded to us by a client of ours. Can’t complain when your clients have such a good sense of humour :)
  2. A comic about phone messages - how true…
  3. A YouTube video test of awareness - this Transport for London ad is very similar to a psychology experiment well-known in the UX world. As you play the video, pay close attention and count the number of basketball passes the white team makes. The rest is revealed later on.

Until next month.