Learn more about user experience, web development and digital marketingView training courses

Our thinking

We’re delighted to announce today that Webcredible has taken the decision to use Google Glass for all of our research activities, recording real-time customer behaviour for our clients 24/7.

The research techniques that we’ve typically used over the years – interviews, focus groups, diary studies, ethnography – are all great but have one main limitation: We can only track what people are doing for a short period of time. Until now that is, where we can offer our clients 24/7 access to their customers.

How it works

We’ve developed an application that enables us to live stream video from Google Glass. Our application tracks tiny movements in the cornea – the part of the eye which does the focusing – and records on to our computers exactly where participants’ eyes are looking. When we compare this to the live streamed footage we get a map of how participants view the world (and your products)! A team of our consultants have been working 24/7 in shifts to analyse participants’ every move. Sounds a bit Big Brother-esque? It is!

Our biggest concern was that participants would remove their glasses so we’ve set it up so they’re delivered a short sharp electric shock if the glasses are removed. At first we thought this was a bit harsh but we’ve had our lawyers come up with a pretty robust waiver for participants to sign. This is especially important for participants that have pacemakers.

One of our first guinea pig participants, ironically called Crystal Glass, told us:

“It took some getting used to wearing the glasses all the time, especially when sleeping. I soon learnt not to remove them or knock them off in my sleep though as the electric shocks were quite painful! I’m glad I could contribute to this research study nonetheless.”

Why we’re doing this

Participants wear the glasses for 2-3 weeks and we collate huge amounts of information during this period. We then analyse the raw data and  produce a report to give our clients a detailed understanding of how they can best cater for (and/or exploit) potential and existing customers. Other exciting things we’re finding out include:

  • Glass’s ability to take photos and video with a “you are there” view really excites us. It captures moments, events, actions just the way the participant sees it.
  • Preliminary tests suggest that Glass is not an invasive piece of tech (at least to everything other than privacy) and we expect research participants  to literally forget we are following their every move.
  • Based on where participants are looking and for how long (as well as numerous other metrics) we’re able to judge moods to certain events, objects and products. It’s now possible to test products and services over a significant period of time with high levels of accuracy.
  • Our clients can have participants sent tasks direct to the retina display using Glass’s in built messaging features.

Privacy concerns

There’s of course been a lot of talk lately about Google Glass and the associated privacy debate, which we’ve followed carefully. We interviewed all of the participants about the experience and they generally seemed OK with it. One of our early beta testers, Mona Lott, mentioned that it took some getting used to wearing Google Glass: “I didn’t feel that wearing the glasses was… necessary while I went to the bathroom. However, I was assured that all footage was confidential and the electric shocks ensured that I complied.”

Despite the privacy concerns and our increased electricity bills we’ve still opted to go ahead with using Google Glass for all our research (our lawyers really did write an excellent waiver for participants to sign). Apparently the shocks were painful and have led to injuries – rest assured, we are investigating these claims but again, thanks to our lawyers, we should be fine whatever the outcome.

By way of compensation for the invasion of privacy, we offer an increased incentive to participants if we capture any… ahem… intimate moments.

In conclusion… Big Brother research is the future!

Despite the privacy issues we believe Google Glass provides an invaluable opportunity for our clients. We’re now in the process of replacing all our research methods with this new technology, providing our clients with a 360 degree view of customer behaviour.

Tell us what you think about our bold decision to use Google Glass for all research – comment below or Tweet us @webcredible with hashtag #BigBrotherResearchWithElectricShocks.

Summer is over and as we are stepping quickly into winter, we have already started reflecting on its good and bad moments. For me, open air music festivals are always top priority in my list of summer events. I enjoy the atmosphere, the people and of course the madness of watching lots of artists in just a few hours. But I have had bad experiences as well – many of this summer’s London-based festivals had a sort of bad luck (or maybe bad organisation?).

The various social media platforms are nowadays the main channels of communication between event organisers and their audience. In this post, I will focus on three festivals I attended and I will try to analyse how their organisers used social media to create, maintain or destroy customer relationships. These festivals are Field Day , Bloc and Hard Rock Calling.

Whenever I reflect on an event, I try to distinguish what happened before, during and after it. That’s what creates the overall audience experience, isn’t it?

Before The Event

Before the event people look to get in the festival mood, to learn more about the artists and maybe win some free tickets to share with friends.
Field Day organisers knew that very well and they created the right style of engagement through Twitter, Facebook and other media. Throughout the year they uploaded podcasts featuring artists from the line-up. After the full line-up was announced, they made targeted posts with news about it and launched quizzes on Facebook. Hundreds of comments and tens of shares on Facebook encouraged various friends of existing followers to ‘Like’ the festival page. Closer to the day of the event, they were regularly giving away free tickets to lucky people who answered to a quiz, re-tweeted or shared a post.

What do they gain? Obviously they increase awareness of their festival and keep interest high (who doesn’t want a free ticket?). A few hours before the big day, they uploaded photos from the space and the stages. In that way, they increased the anticipation and ensured their audience that everything was going according to plan.

Bloc and Hard Rock Calling organisers followed a similar but more mediocre approach. For example, a ship  was to be the main stage at Bloc festival, but fans where kept largely in the dark. Bloc made little effort to stimulate any discussions, retweets or comments among the fans as to their unusual choice of venue.

During the event

During the event, festival goers do not check their Twitter (mainly due to the fact that the 3G network is down, they don’t want to risk bringing their smartphones or they have run out of battery). At any rate, the experience is out there and there is no need for Twitter or Facebook news (the romantic approach).
Well… that might be true, but only when everything goes as planned. What happens if something goes wrong? I was at Bloc when Snoop Dogg never came on stage. Social media was the only way to learn what was happening. At that time, there wasn’t any official announcement, only tweets with rumours, which eventually became reality.

After the event

After the event, people tend to reflect on their experience by sharing pictures, footage or reviews.

Field Day organisers shared audience-generated content from YouTube. Hard Rock Calling fans were able to see professional photographs only few hours after the event.
You might wonder how Bloc organisers faced their catastrophe. The festival was cancelled due to crowd safety concerns in the middle of its first day. The organisers released an official announcement 4 hours after the cancellation, which made things even more complicated. Their facebook page received thousands of comments from people who expressed mostly anger… at best. Everyone was asking for excuses and refunds, but from the other side there was complete silence. You’d better not visit the festival’s Facebook page today, because you will feel sorry or furious. Only after 2 months, the organisers were able to speak plain language and release an official announcement, but it was too late. Loyalty had been lost.

Hard Rock Calling also faced difficulties. Bruce Springsteen was forced to stop while he was playing a duet with Sir Paul McCartney due to overtime (after 11pm there was to be silence). The organisers dealt with fans’ complaints by being the first to write about this decision. They also replied quickly to any followers who complained on Twitter.

This approach to social media complaints is not restricted to the festival space; O2 expertly handled the social media maelstrom in the wake of their 2 day signal outage. Showing empathy and dealing with individual complaints personably goes a long way in calming a social media storm.

Conclusion

Social media strategies are becoming one of the most important factors in the success of your event in terms of attracting and engaging with your audience.

Some might argue that the budget can also influence the promotion of the event. That’s absolutely true. Field Day is an independent festival with a focus on new artists, whereas Hard Rock Calling is held by Live Nation, which is one of the largest event organisers worldwide. Budgets can’t be compared, but numbers of followers on twitter are very close if that means anything.

Social media is a cheap and fairly easy way to create bonds with your target audience. Nevertheless, in the worst case scenarios, you must also be brave and face negative comments in the same way you retweeted compliments. Either you take the risk or leave it.

The mobile and smartphone markets in the UK are huge, as they are worldwide. In the UK we have more phones than people and of those phones over half are smartphones.

As such, it is no surprise that brands, big and small, have taken particular interest in mCommerce. However a conundrum which has proved a stumbling block for some is:  Should we develop a mobile app, a mobile website or both?

Why do consumers care?

In an article I read recently it was claimed that consumers simply do not care if you have a mobile app or website and that they don’t know the difference anyway, or so it was claimed. I disagree.

Even if the consumer does not know the difference, the choice of whether to download your app or browse the mobile web for your services is a conscious one. In a recent study we carried out to better understand mCommerce we discovered that Apps were great for repeat purposes, checking social media or train timetables. However, if a user was looking for pure information on the spur of the moment, in the majority of cases they would use the mobile web to browse for what they were looking for. Even if the consumer were to download your app for their one off purpose if it does not fit into a routine our study showed that it was soon forgotten and subsequently deleted.

Essentially, you need to decide what you want to offer; what can you supply by way of  service? If your offering is not invaluable to a users daily routine, then a mobile app is not ideal (an exception to this rule might be using apps for one off spurts of brand awareness). If you can’t or don’t want to supply such a service via native apps make sure you have a  website optimised for the mobile web, try responsive design. When it comes to mobile the customer is king – “We no longer get to be the tail that wags the dog”.

Looking to the future

Recently there has been growing debate surrounding the future of native apps and whether HTML5 and responsively designed websites might be their downfall. Indeed, HTML5 can offer app like functionality  in a web browser and best of all their is nothing to download. Skeptical?ft-app1

Some big brands have already taken this step, the Financial Times for example. After developing their web app it quickly overtook their native iOS app in popularity.  It became so popular they no longer offer a native equivalent. Whatever their grievances with Apple would they have made this step if it were not for HTML5? Probably not.

However FT’s approach is in no way indicative of the future of native apps. Will manufacturers like Apple, whose success was arguably founded upon native apps, let them disappear? Nevertheless, I believe there will be a shift towards web apps. According to research from IDC by 2013 there will be more than 1 billion HTML5-capable browsers in use throughout the world. Applications for those HTML5 browsers will be created by 2 million HTML Web developers. The future looks bright for HTML5.

To conclude

Research, a clear idea of what you want to offer, and an in-depth understanding of your target audience are integral to your decision concerning mobile websites and native apps. But, as a general rule, apps repeat purposes, mobile sites single purposes.

As far as the future of native apps is concerned, will they even be around in 5 years? If i were to give any advice it would be not to second guess the mobile market. By all means consider HTML5 and definitely look into responsive design but the mobile market moves too fast to predict, and there can certainly be an element of serendipity in developing your mobile offering.

If you are interested in this topic we are releasing the aforementioned mCommerce report in the coming months, so please keep an eye on Twitter and our website!

Driving innovation through customer experience and insight is a great way for brands to gain new competitive advantages, improve customer loyalty and deliver on business and marketing goals.

At the Digital Health Check event run by Figaro Digital in March I explored this subject area in a presentation to demonstrate how insight led innovation can actually be done, and the benefits that can be reaped by implementing it.

I really hoped you enjoyed the presentation but if you missed it here’s the slide deck for you to look through to help inspire your next insight led innovation with real life examples, practical steps and advice. Hope it’s useful!

You can also see a recording of the live presentation so you can get the full commentary and information. Have you implemented this type of approach? Let us know what you think…

Example of a completed design brief templateHow many times did you end up sketching the “perfect idea” for a website page or feature, only to realise later on that you’ve missed something important, and adding it means you have to rethink your concept from scratch? Or, when you’ve got a few alternative sketches, you don’t know where to start?

Even when you’ve done extensive user research that should help you avoid the above problems, it’s often difficult to remember all the relevant research findings in the heat of the designing moment.

That’s why you should make a point of trying to document the goals of your design before you start. Here’s a template to help you write this mini-”design brief” so in 1 sentence:

This (page/element) will be used by (user type/persona) looking to do (goals) and should include the following (information/actions).

For example, imagine you’re designing an ecommerce website and need to sketch a page for customers to track their orders. There’s probably a few ways to organise such a page, but the brief is the same:


This “recent orders” page will be used by customers who’ve made an order looking to:

  • find out when their order will be delivered
  • cancel their order
  • find out how to return an item

and should include the following:

  • list of all orders placed in the last 3 months
  • link to access earlier orders
  • summary of items for each order, order number and when order was placed
  • link to parcel tracking information (if available)
  • link to order cancellation form
  • link to returns form

How you arrange all this information on a page is up to you, but by documenting it upfront you can at least be sure you won’t miss anything important.

To help you using this technique while sketching, we’ve produced a free downloadable PDF template to help you write your design briefs. Just print of a stack of these, keep them in your project area, and remember to fill one in before you start sketching a new page or feature.

Case studies

Our success stories

  • Hotels.com

    Hotels.com gained a much stronger competitive advantage due to a great mobile strategy

  • Macmillan

    Macmillan got fantastic results from our work, including a 50% reduction in mobile homepage drop-offs

  • Hitachi Capital

    Hitachi Capital now delivers a market-leading online proposition and the best user experience possible

More case studies

Training academy

View training courses

About us

We're a user experience agency (UX agency) that creates people-centred, efficient and delightful digital experiences.

Get in touch on 020 7423 6320